01
50,000-name prospect list
Access to at least 50,000 academically qualified senior prospect names, with a documented acquisition methodology.
Pre-bid brief · Live notice · Under NDA 
A prime's pre-bid brief for University of Wyoming KLW-2026-30.
A sole source notification, not an RFP. The University named EAB Global and described the product by EAB's own features. Techtiz drafts the offshore-capable portion of a Statement of Capabilities behind a US prime, never touching student data, never University-facing.
Live · capabilities close Jun 1, 2 PM MT
Awarding body University of Wyoming
Jurisdiction Wyoming
Status Responding under NDA
Notification
KLW-2026-30Sole source notification
Named vendor
EAB GlobalIncumbent, 3-year PO intent
Realistic goal
Trigger competitionNot an award
Techtiz role
Back-officeNDA-first, no student data
Schedule of events
A five-day window, electronic only, now closed.
Submissions received after the deadline or outside the portal may not be considered. There is no questions deadline stated; questions go to the Procurement Officer.
Published, 10:17 AM ET
Notification KLW-2026-30 released, reference 0000425554
Questions
Direct to Kelly Lynne Wooden, Procurement Officer
Capabilities due, 2 PM MT
Same instant as 4 PM Eastern. Electronic portal only
Term
From purchase order execution, if an award proceeds
No real time-zone conflict. The prime database lists the close as 06/01/2026 04:00 PM EDT, the identical moment to 2:00 PM Mountain. The authoritative wording in the notice is 2:00 PM MT. This window has closed.Register at least 48 hours ahead and submit at least two hours before the deadline.
The sole source read
This is a notification, not a competition. The Statement is the trigger.
The University named EAB in the title, described the product by EAB's brand features, and set a five-day response window. Every structural signal favors proceeding with EAB. A Statement of Capabilities is intelligence the University uses to decide whether to compete the work, not a bid to win.
What it isSole source intent to a single named vendor, EAB Global, Inc., for a three-year purchase order. Informational only. Not a request for competitive quotes or proposals.
The windowA Statement of Capabilities may be submitted by any party that believes it can perform comparable work, through the portal, before the deadline.
The decisionThe University reserves sole discretion to proceed with the sole source award or to issue a competitive solicitation. It is the sole judge of quality, performance, and price, stated in that order.
The governing termsThe University's own Terms and Conditions, not the Wyoming Procurement Code that binds state executive agencies. The University's grievance process governs disputes before any judicial review; courts defer to university procurement discretion absent fraud or arbitrary action.
Navigate 360 · The differentiator
The University named Navigate 360 first, and any party that cannot show a credible integration for it is dismissed regardless of other strengths.
Five named integrations sit in scope, but Navigate 360 is the one that decides the read. It is the student success CRM, it carries the highest switching cost, and the University listed it ahead of Appily, Virtual Tour, Edify, and the Adult Learner Recruitment partnership. A response that does not address Navigate 360 by name, with a live integration or a credible technical specification, is dismissed. This is the strongest hook in the notice.
Techtiz helps the prime assemble the Navigate 360 integration specification, the data-flow description, and the test plan as documentation and back-office support. Credentials and live system access stay with the prime. Techtiz holds no Navigate 360 certification and builds no live integration.
Task allocation
What a remote back-office Subcontracting performs, and what stays with the prime.
The boundary that keeps a Subcontracting model clean on a FERPA-gated enrollment engagement.
Regulatory and contractual, not statutory. There is no licensing bar here; this is software and services, not sealed professional work. The limits are FERPA and contract. No University student personally identifiable information moves offshore at any stage, including proposal preparation. Any AI tool that processes student data runs on FERPA-compliant US infrastructure. The University's Terms and Conditions were not included in the notice, so until they are reviewed, offshore support for proposal preparation is assumed permitted.
Remote technology & back-office Subcontracting
Aggregated data only, no student PII
Prospect name database management, aggregated data only, no individual student records
Omnichannel campaign strategy design
Creative asset development from University brand guidelines, no student data
Campaign analytics and reporting, aggregated performance data only
Parent communication content creation, no PII
Statement of Capabilities drafting and document preparation, under NDA, no student data
Navigate 360 and Appily integration: documentation and testing support only, senior oversight US-based, credentials held by the prime
Techtiz operates only in this column, behind the prime, under a signed NDA, never touching student data and never contacting the University.
US prime only
FERPA-gated, credentialed, accountable
Edify data management integration, because it touches the University data environment
AI tool student and parent data processing, because FERPA requires US data handling
Holding and using integration credentials for University systems
Any handling of University student PII at any stage
Gates, stated plainly. A signed NDA, with Wyoming governing law, is in place before any draft or material moves offshore. No student PII offshore at any stage, including proposal preparation. Integration credentials remain with the US prime. AI and data processing run on FERPA-compliant US infrastructure. The NDA covers University student and enrollment data, any proprietary platform specifications shared, and the pre-bid materials, and requires return or destruction of University-sourced materials at engagement end.
Where bids fail
Failing to address Navigate 360 by name The hook
The trap
A response that does not name Navigate 360 and show a live integration or a credible technical specification reads as incapable of the highest-switching-cost connection.
The cost
Dismissed regardless of other strengths. This is the single clearest disqualifier in the notice.
Scope & deliverables
Seven core deliverables, mapped to EAB's named features.
A recruitment services platform and support, scored on a feature-by-feature match against EAB's capabilities. The 50,000-name prospect database and the five-system integration set define the technical weight.
02
Omnichannel strategy
A customized communication strategy across email, SMS, direct mail, digital, and social, with parent and guardian engagement.
03
Deliverable named under NDA.
04
Deliverable named under NDA.
05
Deliverable named under NDA.
06 · The hook
Integration documentation
Within 60 days of contract start, across Navigate 360, Appily, Virtual Tour, Edify, and the Adult Learner Recruitment partnership.
07
Deliverable named under NDA.
Value & pricing
No budget was stated, and no price is submitted at this stage.
Every figure below is an estimate derived from scope, the 50,000-name database, the five-system integration complexity, and the three-year term. The comparable EAB pricing is a public-source estimate. Submitting a price at the notice stage is itself a disqualifier.
Low
~$820k/ 3 yr
Stripped team, fewer integration touchpoints, no AI tools.
MidBase case
~$1.07M/ 3 yr
Full integration set, AI help tools, and creative production. Model under NDA
High
~$1.38M/ 3 yr
Full on-site team, premium AI tools, extensive creative production.
Comparable EAB pricing at similar institutions is estimated at about $200k to $400k per year, roughly $700k to $1.1M over three years. All figures are estimates; no budget appears in the notice.
The variable that moves price most is prospect name acquisition cost plus the omnichannel media buy. These are pass-through costs and can be 40 to 60 percent of total contract value. Any pricing position must address this directly.
No pricing is submitted at the notice stage. Pricing readiness is held for a competitive solicitation if one is issued. Techtiz back-office pricing is scoped per engagement after NDA.
Compliance & records exposure
FERPA is mandatory. Open records exposes anything not properly marked.
The notice names no required certification framework. Two frameworks are recommended, not required. Governing law is Wyoming, First Judicial District, Albany County, with the University's grievance process before judicial review.
FERPA · mandatory
20 U.S.C. 1232g. Governs all student data. No student PII moves offshore at any stage.
Wyoming open records
Wyo. Stat. 16-4-201 et seq. Submitted materials are public records unless properly marked and separately packaged.
PCI DSS Level 1 · NDA
Framework named under NDA.
Section 508 · NDA
Framework named under NDA.
ISO 27001 · NDA
Framework named under NDA.
Confidential supplement
Package proprietary content separately from public content, or lose its protection.
Agency context
Who is buying, and who judges it.
The University of Wyoming is a public corporation and instrumentality of the State of Wyoming under Title 21, in Laramie, Albany County, with an enrollment of about 12,000 students. It buys through <strong>Procurement and Payment Services,</strong> and the named contact and signer is <strong>Kelly Lynne Wooden, Procurement Officer.</strong> The University is the sole judge of quality, performance, and price, and its own Terms and Conditions govern, not the Wyoming Procurement Code that binds state executive agencies.
The University of Wyoming is a public corporation and instrumentality of the State of Wyoming under Title 21, in Laramie, Albany County, with an enrollment of about 12,000 students. It buys through Procurement and Payment Services, and the named contact and signer is Kelly Lynne Wooden, Procurement Officer. The University is the sole judge of quality, performance, and price, and its own Terms and Conditions govern, not the Wyoming Procurement Code that binds state executive agencies.
~12,000
Students, comparable-size benchmark
Laramie
Albany County, Wyoming
Title 21
State instrumentality
The competing field
28 targetable primes behind one named incumbent.
From the prime-contractor database. One of the 29 mapped firms is EAB, the incumbent being challenged, so 28 are targetable. The database carries no revenue or employee data, so no combined-revenue figure is shown. All figures are public-source estimates for prime targeting.
28
Targetable primes (29 mapped, EAB excluded)
18 / / 11
Highly / partially relevant
14 / / 4
HIGH / MEDIUM priority, highly relevant
2
Verified Wyoming firms
No revenue size split is shown. The database revenue and employee columns are empty for every firm, marked TO BE RESEARCHED. The priority placeholders (14000, 4000, 5500) are bucket codes, not dollars. The size signal here is the priority split, not revenue.
The Wyoming count does not reconcile. The database quick-stat line claims 3 Wyoming firms; only 2 appear in the rows, FerryWEB Technologies (Sheridan) and Hardwired Radio (Cheyenne). Treat 2 as verified. State concentration from the verified rows: Texas 5, California 5, Colorado 4, Wyoming 2, Florida 2, Arkansas 2, with single firms across nine more states.
Most recognizable national players, named by reputation with no dollar figure available: EAB Global (incumbent), Ruffalo Noel Levitz, Encoura, Randstad USA, and Liaison International. Adjacent enrollment and student-information vendors on the reference tab include LeadSquared, Modern Campus, PowerSchool, Pathify, Campus Cafe, and Symplicity.
The full named map and the relevance scoring are in the full document pack, shared under NDA.
How Techtiz fits
The offshore-capable production behind your Statement.
Techtiz maps the prime's capabilities against EAB's named features, drafts the integration documentation, and builds the campaign and creative scaffolding. The prime owns the platform, the credentials, the student data, the submission, and every word said to the University.
NDA Prime name and engagement scope stay under NDA. No student PII ever leaves the US prime. Techtiz holds no Navigate 360 certification, no University credentials, and never contacts the University.
Considering a Statement on KLW-2026-30?
Request the full KLW-2026-30 decode pack.
The capability-map structure, the Navigate 360 integration specification draft, the records-and-confidentiality packaging plan, the offshore allocation model, and the competing-field map. All NDA-first. A US-based engagement manager replies within one business day, never University-facing.
Frequently asked questions
Pre-bid brief & confidentiality
Quick answers about how to use this engagement example and what detail is available under NDA.
Why is the prime contractor name withheld?
Most SLED subcontract work sits under mutual NDA and prime branding requirements. Public summaries describe engagement type, technical surface, and outcomes. Partner names and proposal content are shared only with explicit written permission or under an executed teaming agreement.
Can Techtiz support our bid on a similar pursuit?
Yes. If your pursuit matches this engagement type, email sled@techtiz.co or use the teaming intake form. Within 1 business day a U.S.-based partner manager replies with a mutual NDA template and a calendar slot—never agency-facing.
What do we receive under NDA?
Full RFP-decode packs, compliance matrices, technical volumes, submission runbooks, and named-resume options scoped to your vehicle and timeline. Prime name, pricing, and agency data stay inside the prime boundary.
Does Techtiz contact the procuring agency?
No. Techtiz is subcontract-only and never faces the agency. Your program manager holds the client relationship, sign-off, and all agency communication.